/Millennials Were Taught To Build In Private—This Founder Showed Her Work And Won

Millennials Were Taught To Build In Private—This Founder Showed Her Work And Won

United Kingdomgbvia direct
// Job Type
Full Time
// Salary
Not disclosed
// Posted
1 month ago

About the Role

Somewhere in our professional formation, most millennials absorbed the same unwritten rule: arrive finished. Assemble your competence in private, polish it to a shine, and only then present it to the world. The curated LinkedIn, the resume that pretends the path was linear, the cover letter that smooths over every detour—these were the artifacts of a generation taught that authority is fragile and the messy middle is a liability. You did not let people watch you figure it out. You let them see the version of you that already had.

That instinct is quietly becoming a disadvantage, and the people who’ve noticed are pulling ahead.

The shift has a name in some corners—"building in public"—but the label undersells it. It started among indie software founders who shared their revenue numbers and their failures in real time, and it’s since spread through the creator economy and social selling into something closer to a general operating principle: that visible, ongoing learning can be a more durable source of trust than the appearance of having already mastered the thing. The premium on looking finished is collapsing. What's replacing it is a premium on being credibly, demonstrably in motion.

To understand why that's more than a content trend, it helps to listen to someone who has built an entire enterprise on it.

The method hiding inside the transparency

Christin Marie Nichols is a self-taught jewelry founder who scaled a TikTok Shop brand into a multimillion-dollar business, Christin Marie Studio, without formal training, outside investment, or a single thing she pretended to already know. "I'm not formally trained," she told me. “I didn't go to school for fashion or design or jewelry making or anything like that. So I just took everyone along with me while I was learning.”

The easy reading is that this is relatability—a founder being charming about her gaps. The more accurate reading is that she turned the learning curve into infrastructure.

What lets her operate without the usual scaffolding is less a strategy than a posture. "One of the things I always like to say is to be delusional," she told me. "I see the end result, and I just feel like it has to happen." Pair that with consistency and discipline, she added, and "I don’t have a choice but to get there." It sounds like bravado until you notice it's the same disposition that makes building in public survivable: you have to be willing to be seen mid-attempt, before the outcome is guaranteed.

Most organizations treat market research as a slow, expensive phase: guess what people want, commission a study, hope you guessed right before you've spent the money making it. Nichols collapsed that loop into a recurring conversation.

"I really love getting real-time feedback," she said. "I can guess all day, I can make stuff for myself all day, I can look up stuff—but there hasn't been a faster turnaround to get real-time feedback on a product or development, and what people want." Her weekly livestream is named to make the point: Facetime Friday, “because I really feel like I'm just talking to everybody that's tuned in, versus 'here's this, buy this' all the time.”

The payoff is a development cycle a traditional company would envy. When she wanted to test a higher-priced collection she wasn’t sure customers would accept, she didn’t run a pricing analysis, she wore the piece on a livestream and watched the reaction in real time. The demand was instant enough that she stopped the stream to open a pre-order. The research and the sale happened in the same breath.

That is the lesson worth extracting, and it generalizes far beyond jewelry: transparency isn't only a trust exercise. Done deliberately, the open process becomes the data pipeline. The thinness of the casing is the feature. You learn faster because you're learning out loud, in front of the only people whose verdict actually settles the question.

Why the numbers are moving in her direction

Here is where it stops being about any one founder and starts being about the rest of us at work. Because the evidence that authority is migrating away from the polished and toward the visibly authentic is no longer anecdotal.

Start with trust itself. Edelman’s most recent Trust Barometer finds that trust has gone local: as faith in distant institutions erodes, the most trusted institution in the survey is "my employer," and the people we believe are increasingly the ones closest to us: colleagues, neighbors, our own CEO rather than CEOs in the abstract. By the 2026 edition, business had become the only institution viewed as both ethical and competent—but that trust now concentrates in proximity and familiarity, not in the glossy, arms-length authority that an earlier era rewarded. Polish, in other words, is no longer a proxy for credibility. Closeness is.

Consumers have already priced this in. Audiences now report trusting creator content over brand content by a wide margin—roughly 61% to 38%, according to figures presented at Cannes Lions—and the more pixel-perfect a piece of content looks, the more it reads as an ad people tune out. The person visibly making the thing now out-persuades the corporation selling it.

That's the same instinct Nichols leans on every week, and she's explicit that it only works because it isn't a sales pitch.

"I don't like to feel like I'm trying to push my product onto a customer," she said. "I just naturally show how I use it. I hate feeling like I'm pushing things on them." What keeps people coming back, in her telling, is "that natural relationship and connection"—and a refusal to perform. She bristles at the word influencer for the same reason. "People are influenced because they can see the things that I'm doing, they can implement them as well," she said. “It's never with the intention of I'm just trying to make money.”

And the logic isn’t confined to marketing—it’s reshaping how people get hired. Some 85% of employers now say they practice skills-based hiring, prioritizing demonstrated capability over the credential that used to serve as a gatekeeper. The premise underneath it is the same one driving build-in-public: what you can visibly do is becoming more legible and more valued than the polished pedigree that once stood in for it.

It's a genuinely strange thing to say to a generation drilled in the opposite, but the direction is consistent across all three: authority is accruing to those who are demonstrably in motion rather than those who merely look finished. The consultant who narrates a pivot instead of pretending the strategy was always obvious. The manager who says "I haven't solved this yet, here's my current thinking." The job seeker whose public body of half-finished work tells a more convincing story than any claim of expertise. In each case, the credential gap that an earlier professional culture told you to hide becomes, handled well, a relationship to leverage.

The part nobody has solved

This is not a frictionless gospel, and the honest version of the lesson includes its limits.

The clearest evidence is buried in that same hiring statistic. Employers love to say they’ve gone skills-first, but when Harvard Business School and the labor-analytics firm Burning Glass examined what actually happened, they found fewer than one in 700 hires in 2023 genuinely reflected the shift. The rhetoric raced ahead; the behavior lagged. The old reflex—reward the credential, trust the polish—turns out to be sticky, embedded in habits that change far slower than press releases.

Nichols names the same tension from the other side. "I do hear mixed messages," she said. "People saying you should or you shouldn’t, or that you can only do that for so long." That "for so long" is the unsolved problem sitting under the entire approach. The intimacy that makes building in public work is hardest to preserve at exactly the moment it's succeeding. Scale introduces layers. Teams introduce distance. The institutional partners and bigger stages that growth invites tend to demand precisely the buttoned-up, finished presentation that transparency refuses. At some point, the thing that got you here strains against the thing required to go further.

No one has a clean answer for what happens then—whether the openness scales, mutates, or eventually gets traded away for reach. It’s the live question facing everyone who has made visibility their advantage, founders and employees alike.

But the directional signal is hard to miss, and it's worth internalizing regardless of where you sit. The reflex to hide the learning—to wait until you're polished, credentialed, and certain before you let anyone watch—was a rational response to the rules millennials were handed. Those rules are changing underneath us. The professionals adapting fastest aren't the ones who've gotten better at looking finished. They're the ones who stopped performing the finish and let people see the work instead.

Interested in this job?

Login to Apply

Use our AI to tailor your resume for this Millennials Were Taught To Build In Private—This Founder Showed Her Work And Won position at Forbes.